Carrier 590A Manuale di Servizio Pagina 11

  • Scaricare
  • Aggiungi ai miei manuali
  • Stampa
  • Pagina
    / 28
  • Indice
  • SEGNALIBRI
  • Valutato. / 5. Basato su recensioni clienti
Vedere la pagina 10
3
1.3. POLE-ZERO CANCELLATION
Pole-zero cancellation is a method for eliminating
pulse undershoot after the first differentiating
network. In an amplifier not using pole-zero
cancellation (Fig. 1.1), the exponential tail on the
preamplifier output signal (usually 50 to 500
s)
causes an undershoot whose peak amplitude is
roughly determined from:
undershoot amplitude
=
differentiated pulse amplitude
differentiation time
preamplifier pulse decay time
For a 1- s differentiation on time and a 50- s
preamplifier pulse decay time, the maximum
undershoot is 2% and this decays with a 50-
s time
constant. Under overload conditions, this
undershoot is often sufficiently large to saturate the
amplifier during a considerable portion of the
undershoot, causing excessive dead time. This
effect can be reduced by increasing the preamplifier
pulse decay time (which generally reduces the
counting rate capabilities of the preamplifier) or
compensating for the undershoot by providing pole-
zero cancellation.
Pole-zero cancellation is accomplished by the
network shown in Fig. 1.2. The pole [s + (1/T
o
)] due
to the preamplifier pulse decay time is canceled by
the zero of the network [s + (K/R
2
C
1
)]. In effect, the
path across the differentiation capacitor adds an
attenuated replica of the preamplifier pulse to just
cancel the negative undershoot of the
differentiating network.
Total preamplifier-amplifier pole-zero cancellation
requires that the preamplifier output pulse decay
time be a single exponential decay and matched to
the pole-zero-cancellation network. The variable
pole-zero-cancellation network allows accurate
cancellation for all preamplifiers having 30-
s or
greater decay times. Improper matching of the
pole-zero-cancellation network will degrade the
overload performance and cause excessive pileup
distortion at medium counting rates. Improper
matching causes either an under-compensation
(undershoot is not eliminated) or an over-
compensation (output after the main pulse does not
return to the baseline and decays to the baseline
with the preamplifier time constant). The pole-zero
adjust is accessible on the front panel and can
easily be adjusted by observing the baseline with an
oscilloscope with a monoenergetic source or pulser
having the same decay time as the preamplifier
under overload conditions. The adjustment should
be made so that the pulse returns to the baseline in
the minimum time with no undershoot.
1.4. ACTIVE FILTER
When only FET gate current and drain thermal
noise are considered, the best signal-to-noise ratio
occurs when the two noise contributions are equal
for a given input pulse shape. The Gaussian pulse
shape (Fig. 1.3) for this condition requires an
amplifier with a single RC differentiate and n equal
RC integrates where n approaches infinity.
The Laplace transform of this transfer function is
where the first factor is the single differentiate and
the second factor is the n integrates. The active
filter approximates this transfer function.
Figure 1.3 illustrates the results of pulse shaping in
an amplifier. Of the four pulse shapes shown the
cusp would produce minimum noise but is
impractical to achieve with normal electronic
circuitry and would be difficult to measure with an
ADC. The true Gaussian shape deteriorates the
signal-to-noise ratio by only about 12% from that of
the cusp and produces a signal that is easy to
measure, but requires many sections of integration
(n
). With two sections of integration the
waveform identified as a Gaussian approximation
can be obtained, and this deteriorates the signal-to-
noise ratio by about 22%. The ORTEC active filter
network in the 590A provides a fourth waveform
(Fig. 1.3). This waveform has characteristics
superior to the n = 2 Gaussian approximation, yet
obtains them with two complex poles and a real
pole. By this method the output pulse shape has a
good signal-to-noise ratio, is easy to measure, and
yet requires only a practical amount of electronic
circuitry to achieve the desired results. The signal
to noise ratio is degraded by about 17%.
Vedere la pagina 10
1 2 ... 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 ... 27 28

Commenti su questo manuale

Nessun commento